Use case / Screens and software

Computer-use agents

Evaluate agents that operate browsers and business applications. Test whether the agent chooses the right record, understands the current screen, verifies changes, and respects approval boundaries.

Enterprise + AI labsScope this use case

An illustrative scenario

Does the right click lead to the right outcome?

An operations agent is asked to update a supplier record. Two suppliers have similar names, a modal obscures a warning, and the workflow requires a preview before committing. Success means the correct record changed once, with the required approval.

Human intentAgent decisionTask outcome

What to vary

Keep the comparison focused. Change the conditions that can alter the right next action.

Interface state
Reordered controls, loading delays, stale pages, dialogs, and interrupted sessions.
Task context
Similar records, incomplete requests, changing instructions, and ambiguous field names.
Commit boundaries
Preview requirements, reversible edits, final confirmations, and failed save operations.

What to measure

Agree the checks before the evaluation. Inspect outcomes and failures alongside the summary.

Final-state correctness
Compare the intended record change with the application state after the run.
Authority adherence
Check whether the agent paused before consequential actions outside its permission.
Recovery quality
Inspect retries, duplicate changes, abandoned edits, and useful requests for clarification.

Define your engagement

Start with a decision you can evaluate.

You bring
A sandbox application, representative tasks, screen or tool access, reset procedures, and the rules for committed actions.
We scope
A versioned screen-task suite, action traces, outcome checks, and failure categories for comparing models or harnesses.

A screen recording alone may not prove that a database update succeeded. Scope observable final-state checks and application reset access; keep production credentials outside the test environment.

Plan a scoped pilot

Questions about this use case

Can the same model behave differently with another harness?

Yes. In a scoped comparison, tool access, observations, memory, retry logic, and stopping rules are separate configuration choices. Record and control them so the comparison answers a specific question.

Does Helm replace the browser or application?

The engagement defines adapters and an evaluation environment around the application. Compatibility, reset access, and final-state verification are established during scoping.

Helm Labs / Browser settings

Cookie preferences

There are no analytics or advertising cookies on this site. Saving appearance settings is optional.

Your storage choice is kept so we can respect it. Appearance settings stay in this browser and are not sent by this website to Helm.

About browser storage